Saturday, January 8, 2011

Mount Rainier from Nisqually valley 1947




#26 p 4.Mount Rainier from Nisqually Valley.
Jack Barrett photo July l947 during brief break in clouds. Trees appear to be subalpine firs Abies lasiocarpa, well designed to withstand heavy loads of snow with short upper branches. They manage to clone themselves by forming roots when lower branches touch the ground. They are among the western conifers that grow closest to timberline, tolerating heavy winter snow and wind and summer drought. They often occur in dry parklike areas near grassland and alpine flowers and have a characteristic recognizable tree architecture. They hybridize with the related balsam fir Abies balsamea of Canada and eastern North America. The Barretts spent two nights in the Southwest portion of Mount Rainier National Park but only had about two hours of cloud-free viewing when Jack Barrett was able to take this color photo.+ T TAURI stars--T Tauri Stars The evolutionary picture of low mass protostars (T Tauri stars, M less than 2 M(sun)) is thought to be somewhat under control, i.e., very slowly rotating cloud + trigger ===> collapse ===> star + disk formation ====> slow contraction and accretion + intense stellar winds (bipolar flows) ===> ignition of hydrogen burning and appearance of star on the Main Sequence. Now, what are some details of this process? initially, the clouds which collapse are thought to be very slowly rotating (===>the spin may only be important in the later stages of collapse--initially it plays very little role in the formation process) and to not have uniform density (the clouds are initially denser in their centers than near their edges). The consequences of the former have been roughly discussed already while the latter condition leads to an inside-out collapse. Huh? What does this mean? What happens is that the dense cores collapse faster than the less dense outer regions of the cloud. This follows from the free-fall time ~ 1/sqrt(Gxdensity). The initial collapse of the core is quite fast; time ~ 1/sqrt(6.7x10**(-8) x10**(-18) gm per cc) ~ 50,000 - 100,000 years or so. The lower density envelope takes longer to collapse accrete (collapse onto the protostar); time ~ millions of years or so. Roughly, speaking the Sun forms as shown here. The inside-out collapse leads to the formation of the forming star in the center of the cloud which then slowly builds up its mass by accreting the outer layers of the cloud. Another noteworthy aspect of this later stage of formation is that before the star actually gets hot enough to ignite nuclear fusion, an intense stellar wind is generated. Often times because the cloud was slowly rotating, a disk of material forms around the star. The disk collimates the intense stellar wind into 2 oppositely directed beams producing what is referred to as a bipolar flow. Outside of the interesting appearance of a bipolar flow, what are some consequences of the stellar wind? Well, for one thing ===> can cause the forming star to lose up to 0.4 M(sun)!! for another ===> can start to disrupt the cloud. Is the disruption of the cloud important? Well, even though it takes several millions of years for the cloud to accrete onto the protostar, because the protostars are relatively low mass, it takes even longer to slowly contract and approach starhood. For the most part, the cloud has a chance to accrete onto the protostar before the violent stages of evolution begin. This is important in two senses: the forming is star de-cloaked before it actually beomes a star. We can see T Tauri stars in the visible portion of the spectrum. the cloud collapse process reaches completion before the cloud is disrupted and so, the newly formed star will be roughly the mass of the initially unstable cloud (minus the wind, ... ) Lower Mass Limit As the forming stars slowly contract trying to reach densities and temperatures in their cores which are high enough to ignite fusion, an interesting thing happens to low mass clouds. Before their T's get high enough, their densities actually become large enough to make the electrons in the cores degnerate. Once the electrons become degenerate, it becomes very hard to compress them. Effectively what this means is that the cloud stops contracting (stops compressing). The core of the star thus stops getting hotter and nuclear fusion is never ignited ===> the cloud never formally becomes a star. We refer to such objects as brown dwarfs planets (e.g., Jupiter) An interesting comment is is that there is something strange about the star formation process. We might expect there to be a smooth distribution of objects (in mass) between stars and planet-sized things. That is, we might expect to see objects with mass spanning the range between Jupiter and the stars on the Main Sequence. Further, we know that the number of stars for a given mass is larger the smaller the mass of the star, e.g., M stars are much more common than O stars. If this trend continued, we would expect to see many more planets and brown dwarfs than M stars. Surprisingly, there appears to be a gap between the lowest mass stars and brown dwarfs and planets in terms of mass. There is not a smooth distribution in terms of their mass. The process of star apparently is different for star-sized things than it is for planet-sized things. ++The ejection of T Tauri stars from molecular clouds and the fate of circumstellar discs/Phil Armitage and Cathie Clarke-Abstract: We investigate the evolution of circumstellar discs around T Tauri stars that are ejected from small stellar clusters within molecular clouds. In particular, we study how the interaction that leads to ejection may hasten the transition between Classical and Weak-lined T Tauri status. In our models, ejections of T Tauri stars at velocities of 3-10 km/s truncate the accretion disc at radii between 1 and 10 a.u., reducing the viscous evolution time of the disc so that accretion rapidly ceases. The observational appearance of the resulting systems is then dependent on the presence or absence of a stellar magnetic field. For non-magnetic stars we find that a near-infra red excess should persist due to reprocessing of stellar radiation, but that this is greatly diminished for magnetic T Tauri stars by the presence of a magnetosphere extending to corotation. In either case, there is a period when ejected stars should appear as non-accreting systems with detectable circumstellar material at wavelengths of 5 microns and beyond. We discuss the implications of these results for models in which ejected stars contribute to the halo of pre-main-sequence objects discovered from ROSAT observations of star forming regions and the All-Sky Survey. Introduction -Models for T Tauri accretion discs Timescale for the CTTS WTTS transition Numerical simulations Summary Acknowledgements References Appendix: calculating disc spectral energy distributions About this document ... Also available for download in compressed PostScript format here. - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 285, 540 (1997).
Subject: Mount Rainier

No comments:

Post a Comment